Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in shift and non-shift workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Identifying risk profiles for excess sedentary behaviour in youth using individual, family and neighbourhood characteristics
November 24, 2021
Contrasting compositions of sitting, standing, stepping, and sleeping time: associations with glycaemic outcome by diabetes risk
December 9, 2021

A paper titled “Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in shift and non-shift workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis” has recently been published in Preventive Medicine Reports. The full publication is available here (open access). The summary of the paper and citation details are re-posted below.

ABSTRACT

Research examining the prevalence, physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) in shift workers show mixed results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare PA and SB in shift workers with non-shift workers following the PRISMA guidelines. Ebscohost megafile ultimate (CINHAL, E-journals, Academic search ultimate, health source consumer edition, SPORT Discus), PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct databases were searched up to April 2021. Cross-sectional and baseline data from longitudinal studies reporting PA and SB in full time workers were eligible. Data on participants characteristics and time spent in PA and SB and/or prevalence of workers meeting PA guidelines were extracted and pooled with random effects model. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) 10-item checklist was adapted and used. A total of 49 studies met inclusion criteria and 21 studies included for meta-analysis. The prevalence of meeting physical activity guidelines (OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.68, 1.03) and standardized mean difference (SMD) of time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (SMD −0.1, 95% CI: −0.4, 0.20) were similar in shift and non-shift workers. Time spent in sedentary behaviour was lower in shift workers than non-shift workers (SMD −0.2, 95% CI: 0.50, −0.001). While the differences in PA are not so evident between shift and non-shift workers, the prevalence of sufficient PA was low in both groups. These preliminary findings provide support for inclusion of physical activity and sedentary behaviour in health promotion interventions targeted at shift workers.

CITATION 

Monnaatsie, M., Biddle, S. J. H., Khan, S., & Kolbe-Alexander, T. (2021). Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in shift and non-shift workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine Reports, 24, 101597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101597

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.