Impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial-dependent vasodilation in healthy adults

Perceptions of physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines among end-users and stakeholders: a systematic review
March 11, 2022
Modelling the potential health and economic benefits of reducing population sitting time in Australia
March 23, 2022
Perceptions of physical activity and sedentary behaviour guidelines among end-users and stakeholders: a systematic review
March 11, 2022
Modelling the potential health and economic benefits of reducing population sitting time in Australia
March 23, 2022

Thank you to Madeline Shivgulam from Dalhousie University, Canada, for sharing her recently published research article that investigated the impacts of habitual sedentary patterns on lower limb vascular health. Citation details and the summary of the paper are below. The full-text article can be found here.

Citation

Shivgulam ME, O’Brien MW, Johns JA, et al. Impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial-dependent vasodilation in healthy adults. Vascular Medicine. March 2022. doi:10.1177/1358863X211065494

Abstract

Introduction:
Acute, laboratory-based bouts of prolonged sitting attenuate lower-limb arterial endothelial-dependent vasodilation. However, the impact of habitual sedentary patterns on popliteal artery endothelial health is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that greater habitual total sedentary time, more time spent in prolonged sedentary bouts, and fewer sedentary breaks would be associated with worse popliteal flow-mediated dilation (FMD) responses.

Methods:
This cross-sectional study used 98 healthy participants (19–77 years, 53 females) that wore an activPAL monitor on the thigh for 6.4 ± 0.8 days to objectively measure sedentary activity and completed a popliteal ultrasound assessment to determine FMD. Both relative (%baseline diameter) and absolute (mm) FMD were calculated. Using bivariate correlation and multiple regression analyses, we examined if there were relationships between sedentary outcomes and FMD while statistically controlling for any potential confounders.

Results:
In the multiple regression model, age (p = 0.006, β = −0.030, 95% CI = −0.051, −0.009) and total time in sedentary bouts > 1 hour (p = 0.031, β = −0.005, 95% CI = −0.009, −0.001) were independent predictors of relative FMD. Age (β = −0.002, 95% CI = −0.003, −0.001), mean blood flow (β = 0.013, 95% CI = 0.002, 0.024), moderate-intensity physical activity (β = 155.9E−5, 95% CI = 22.4E−5, 289.4E−5), sedentary breaks (β = 0.036, 95% CI = 0.007, 0.066), and total time spent in sedentary bouts > 1 hour (β = −25.02E−5, 95% CI = −47.67E−5, −2.378E−5) were predictors of absolute FMD (all, p < 0.047). All independent outcomes remained significant after partially controlling for all other predictor variables (all, p < 0.031).

Conclusions:
Habitual prolonged sedentary bouts and sedentary breaks, but not total sedentary time, were predictors of popliteal endothelial-dependent vasodilatory function. The patterns by which sedentary time is accumulated may be more important than the total sedentary time on lower-limb arterial health.

To read the full text, please visit this link: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1358863X211065494